Skip to main content

The Narrowing of Taste & Its Impact on Preaching

Today while listening to the Sirius/XM Deep Tracks channel I heard “Sue Me, Sue You Blues” from George Harrison’s 1973 album Living in the Material World. I used to own that album (vinyl, naturally) and wish I still did.

When I plunked down the money for the LP I was mainly interested in hearing the single “Give Me Love (Give Me Peace on Earth).” As I listened over and over to the disc, though, I came to like other songs on it even more, especially the title track and “Don’t Let Me Wait Too Long.” The thing is, though, that I had to listen to the entire album to find the variety of music and the hidden treasures on the record.

That’s the way we used to listen to music. Oh, we’d listen to the hit singles on our favorite radio station (WQXI FM out of Atlanta for me) but we’d buy the albums and listen to all the songs on them—over and over.

Hearing that old song from that favorite old album of mine got me to thinking about how the way people listen to music has changed. Listening to Top 40 radio back in 1973, we’d listen to whatever they played and we came to like all kinds of styles. Listing the artists who had the Top 10 hits of 1973 will make my point: Tony Orlando & Dawn, Jim Croce, Roberta Flack, Marvin Gaye, Paul McCartney & Wings, Kris Kristofferson, Elton John, Billy Preston, Carly Simon, and Diana Ross.

We took what we got from Top 40 radio and we took what we got from the albums we purchased and we learned to like a lot of it.

Things are different now.

We can, with our MP3 players, compile a playlist of only songs that fit our particular taste.

We can, if we subscribe to satellite radio, listen to stations that play only the styles of music that we like (I most often hit the preset buttons for Classic Vinyl, Classic Rewind, and Deep Tracks).

We only have to listen to what we really like; we can shut ourselves off from what we don’t like.

Come to think of it, we can do the same kind of thing with our choice of information outlets. Back in the day, your TV choices were pretty much limited to Cronkite on CBS and Huntley & Brinkley on NBC; my memory is that both presentations were middle-of-the-road. Now, though, if you’re a traditionalist you watch CNN, if you’re more conservative you watch FOX, and if you’re more liberal you watch MSNBC. But we watch the outlet that supports our viewpoint and that confirms our pre-conceived notions. Few of us bother to sample the offerings of all the outlets.

I think that all of this has implications for how people hear our preaching.

Simply put, they like what they like. They’re accustomed to narrowing their listening choices to what suits their artistic or ideological tastes. Aren’t they likely to bring that same mindset to church with them?

What if you’re a preacher who tries to preach the whole album—hidden treasures, boring cuts, daring experiments, and all—but your church is filled with people who have trained themselves to listen only to their favorite hits? What if you’re an NPR preacher—you know, one who tries to go into depth on the important stories of the Bible—but your church is filled with people who have been conditioned to listen only for the sound bites that support what they already think?

The narrowing of taste on the part of our listeners makes preaching these days quite a challenge.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Amazing Belief (Mark 6:1-6)

(Preached at Rocky Creek Baptist Church, Forsyth GA, on July 8, 2018) I wonder how much we really believe in Jesus. That may sound like a strange thing to ask people who have come to church, but it’s something we should give some serious thought to. We may have more in common with the people of Jesus’ hometown than we care to admit. When Jesus encountered the people in Nazareth, “he was amazed at their unbelief” (v. 6a). We may be amazed at it too. After all, they knew him. They had probably heard about his teachings and healings, and now he was coming home. We might expect them to welcome him as the hometown boy made good. But they didn’t. They instead “took offense” at him. Given the questions they asked, we might express their attitude as something like, “Who does he think he is, anyway? After all, he’s one of us, and he’s no better than we are.” They even seem to put him down a little bit: “How can a man who works in construction also work miracles?” The bottom li

An Experiment in Preaching

A friend who in his late fifties took a new pastorate said that he had written the last sermon he ever intended to write, meaning that he planned to use the vast collection of sermons that he had built up over his career and produce nothing new. I have in my paper and electronic files every sermon I have ever written; I even have the outlines, some of which were lifted straight out of the back of my trusty Thompson Chain Reference Bible, from my first halting efforts, which were quite different than my later halting efforts. I have at times “re-preached” some of my “greatest hits”; in so doing I heeded the wise words of my wise father who once told me, “If it was worth preaching once it’s worth preaching twice.” And if it’s worth preaching twice maybe it’s worth preaching thrice or more! Over the last twenty-five years I have written full manuscripts for 99% of the sermons that I’ve preached and 90% of the time I’ve taken that manuscript into the pulpit with me. Last Sunday I began an

The Letters to the Seven Churches: Ephesus (Revelation 2:1-7)

(Second in a series on the Book of Revelation) Chapters two and three of Revelation contain individual letters written to the seven churches in Asia Minor to whom the entire book of Revelation is addressed. We should see these letters as seven actual letters written to seven actual churches in seven actual cities. There is absolutely no evidence that would cause us to see the seven churches as somehow representing seven periods of church history, as some would have us do. Our appropriate use of these letters is twofold. First, we can use them to gain insight into the historical situation addressed by the book of Revelation. Second, we can look for parallels between their situation and ours so that we can accurately apply the message in the letters to our own situation. Let us first look at some of the details of the letter to Ephesus. First, note that the letter is addressed to the “angel” of the church. Some have suggested that the “angel” of the church is the pastor o